<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Execution Blog &#187; Workforce Optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/tag/workforce-optimization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution</link>
	<description>Execution is the Difference.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:53:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Stack Ranking Employees Works</title>
		<link>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/stack-ranking-employees-works/</link>
		<comments>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/stack-ranking-employees-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 23:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Berggren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Strategic HR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stack ranker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uncertain times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workforce Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/workforce-performance/?p=313</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now more than ever, organizations need to optimize their workforce in today's economic climate of falling revenues and shrinking profits. Companies have long used stack-ranking to manage their people and identify employees to manage out or up, GE for example&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now more than ever, organizations need to optimize their workforce in today&#8217;s economic climate of falling revenues and shrinking profits. Companies have long used stack-ranking to manage their people and identify employees to manage out or up, GE for example categorizes their workers as being top, middle and low performers with 20% high, 70% middle, and 10% low performer distribution. They regularly manage out the bottom 10%. Stack ranking is a powerful tool, but does it work? </p>
<p><strong>Professor of management at Drake University in Iowa, Steve Scullen, found that forced ranking, including the firing of the bottom 5% or 10%, results in an impressive 16% productivity improvement.</strong></p>
<p>Companies that are able to quickly compare the performance of their people to find high and low performers have an advantage over those who cannot. Low performers actually cost the company money, so when a business manages them out, they see an immediate benefit. The opportunity cost is even higher. If high performers contribute about 5 times as much as low performers, as our friend and thought leader <a title="Cappelli" href="http://www.successfactors.com/research/thought-leaders/peter-cappelli/">Dr. Peter Cappelli</a> has found in his research, the opportunity costs is huge. Imagine how much more value the company could generate if they could replace low performers with high performers.</p>
<p><img src="http://img260.imageshack.us/img260/3719/stankercg3.jpg" alt="Stack Ranker" width="205" height="140" /></p>
<p>These kinds of optimizations are on everyone&#8217;s mind in todays slowing economic environment. SuccessFactors decided to <a href="http://www.successfactors.com/stack-rank/enterprise/">tailor a solution</a> for optimizing the workforce by building a tool that allows managers to stack rank their employees.</p>
<p>Of course stack ranking isn&#8217;t just about managing out low performers, but it is also about ensuring that you are able to find and cultivate your best talent. Those top performers who contribute 5 times as much as the low performers should be rewarded, leaders should be identified and trained. Competencies should be compared and managed across teams to ensure that the right capabilities are in place. Stack ranking is a great tool not only for optimizing your workforce, but also for building it. </p>
<p>Already rich with performance management data, the SuccessFactors Stank Ranker helps managers to:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Visually Rank Talent</strong> – Instantly identify your top-ranked players so that you can optimize your team by motivating and cultivating your best people. Give limited rewards to top employees that deserve extra recognition, or quickly identify low performers to let go when faced with tough layoff decisions.</li>
<li><strong>Go Beyond Performance Reviews</strong> –Stack Ranker expands the formal review process by letting you capture new characteristics for a more holistic assessment. For example, you can incorporate factors like criticality of the role into ranking or other criteria to serve as tie breakers.</li>
<li><strong>Assess Everyone at Once</strong> – Quickly assess your entire team across critical competencies and criteria in real time &#8212; all in one place. Side-by-side rating promotes more accurate relative assessments.</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.successfactors.com/stack-rank/enterprise/">Stack Ranker was designed to help companies act now</a>. Organizations simply cannot afford to carry the dead weight of low performers in these uncertain times. Furthermore, they need to move quickly or they will be outflanked by their competitors. Tools like Stack Ranker are critical to succeeding in today&#8217;s environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/stack-ranking-employees-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you are going to fail, do it fast</title>
		<link>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/fail-faster-to-succeed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/fail-faster-to-succeed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erik Berggren</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employee Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Bundy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engagement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entrepreneur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workforce Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zappos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/workforce-performance/?p=298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: 0.5in;">It’s an old adage that you have to try and fail before you succeed, in fact entrepreneurs practically live by this code. But what about established organizations? A lot of businesses don’t feel this way, even though they should. The&#8230;</p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: 0.5in;">It’s an old adage that you have to try and fail before you succeed, in fact entrepreneurs practically live by this code. But what about established organizations? A lot of businesses don’t feel this way, even though they should. The sooner an employee fails, the sooner the individual can move onto to the next task, and the sooner the company can act.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: 0.5in;">People can learn from failure &#8211; there is an upside to chances taken, but if a person knows they will fail, the sooner they do it the better. Take the case of a sales rep constantly dragging on with an opportunity that never will materialize &#8211; better to get to fail and move on, to free up time for other accounts.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: 0.5in;">When it comes to managing employees not only does it take some investment <a href="http://www.successfactors.com/docs/AppreciatingPeople_kirkerik.pdf">to get people fully productive</a> as we’ve researched with <a href="http://www.successfactors.com/research/thought-leaders/kirk-hallowell">Dr. Hallowell at PDI</a>, but there is also a significant cost to keeping disengaged employees. Necessary separation is important to manage.<span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: 0.5in;"><img style="vertical-align: middle;" src="http://img329.imageshack.us/img329/217/algv2.jpg" alt="Al Bundy" width="199" height="223" /><span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: 0.5in;">“I feel so good&#8211;I&#8217;m almost happy” &#8211; Al Bundy. It’s not just about the bottom line, people should work where they can be engaged in their jobs. One company, Zappos, really gets it. After the first week of work, they offer their new hires 1000 dollars to quit. They figure, if a person takes the money, he or she isn’t really engaged and didn’t belong there in the first place. This is what understanding human capital is all about, finding ways to maximize those factors, like engagement, that really impact performance over the course of an individual’s career.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: 0.5in;">Today, new hires have an average tenure of about 3.5 years, which is not a lot of time to get them up to the plate and hitting home runs. Don’t worry if your rookies make some mistakes &#8211; each mistake can provide valuable insight into setting the right course for your new hire, and accelerate successes . Opportunity is born from failure. Entrepreneurs get it. Zappos gets it. So could you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/fail-faster-to-succeed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
