Actually if you think about it, when is the best opportunity to actually go on the offense and make a change? When the going gets tough or when everything is gently pointing upwards? Companies will either be acquired, stripped of assets, or go on the offense to acquire underpriced assets when markets and demand soften up. The real deal then is obviously to make sure you quickly can get your organization aligned and executing on the new company’s direction, and that you drive the calculated synergies of a merger or acquisition home. With people being by far the biggest expense for any given business (on average 70% of operational cost) how you deal with your joined workforce must logically be the most important factor in any M&A situation.

“In any merger or acquisition, investment banks and equity analysts will provide you with a plethora of figures quantifying the synergistic strategic benefits of the union. Yet what determines whether a merger succeeds or fails is really its people.” – Jean-Pierre Garnier, ex-CEO of GlaxoSmithKline

Logically then, companies with better people processes and a serious focus on people performance should do better in a merger. To test this hypothesis, SuccessFactors research examined the performance of ten of our customers that specifically cited challenges resulting from a merger or acquisition as their business drivers for investing in SuccessFactors. The results were clear – the ten companies that leveraged SuccessFactors to drive the merger home completely outperformed their competition in 12 month revenue growth, 12 month income growth, return on equity and price to book ratio. These mergers were not just successful on paper, they worked in the real world.

Download the SuccessFactors Research Data Sheet: Mergers & Acquisitions to see just how successful our customers are and how they are winning in these uncertain economic times.

The economy goes in cycles. I know it feels like a long time ago, but do you remember that we had a pretty quick and tough downswing that started in March 2000? 2001 and 2002 felt like a nuclear winter to a lot of people and businesses. I’m not saying that the current situation has the same underlying factors and patterns as the last time that we had this tough economic climate, but businesses and people are to a large extent equally as affected by it as before. Smart companies learned from the mistakes we made the last time the economic cycle entered a downswing and avoid repeating them.

So what did we learn from the last downswing? Some companies really lost and others came out of the economic turmoil even stronger, making real gains relative to the competition. Business, like sports, is very competitive and relative. Making a relative gain is easier when everybody is hurt rather than when all are performing well and happily taking orders serving demand. Furthermore, it was clear that those companies that avoided facing the new situation lost. Inaction is never the solution for advancing down the field. So companies that tried to take advantage of the economic downswing with clear actions won.

Here are some mistakes that losers make to learn from:

• Losing companies that get caught up in internal reconfiguring and take on an inward focus also tend to forget about their customers need and the value provided to them
• Losing companies fall for the pressure to cut people across the board when called on to downsize and reduce costs
• Losing companies alienate talent with poor decisions made through an extreme focus on short-term results; alienation which can last years thereafter.

SuccessFactors Research has recently written the paper Winning Through Talent in Uncertain Times, addressing how companies can get ahead when times are tough. Learn from your competitors’ mistakes, smartly align your resources, and turn an economic downswing into an economic opportunity for your company.