<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuts and Bolts of Succession</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/nuts-and-bolts-of-succession/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/nuts-and-bolts-of-succession/</link>
	<description>Execution is the Difference.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:42:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Max Goldman</title>
		<link>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/nuts-and-bolts-of-succession/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 06:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://10.50.0.97/wordpress/workforce-performance/index.php/nuts-and-bolts-of-succession/#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Dubs,

Not sure if I agree with you on that one. Even though yours is the conventional wisdom, I have to think that things are changing. The fact that good succession planning increases retention and reduces recruiting costs (becuase internal candidates can be more readily found) makes the case, for me at least, that  it&#039;s time for succession to work it way down through the biggest organizations and even into medium sized businesses as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dubs,</p>
<p>Not sure if I agree with you on that one. Even though yours is the conventional wisdom, I have to think that things are changing. The fact that good succession planning increases retention and reduces recruiting costs (becuase internal candidates can be more readily found) makes the case, for me at least, that  it&#8217;s time for succession to work it way down through the biggest organizations and even into medium sized businesses as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Double Dubs</title>
		<link>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/nuts-and-bolts-of-succession/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Double Dubs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 04:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://10.50.0.97/wordpress/workforce-performance/index.php/nuts-and-bolts-of-succession/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Max:  Thanks for the link - I found it quite interesting.

It&#039;s true that I have also never figured out why people try doing succession on very broad populations.  Even for very large companies, we&#039;re talking about the top couple hundred employees - a fraction of 1%.

A critical mistake is that when this succession population grows, you&#039;re really starting in on career development, performance management, and general talent management.    Succession can easily grow out of control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Max:  Thanks for the link &#8211; I found it quite interesting.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that I have also never figured out why people try doing succession on very broad populations.  Even for very large companies, we&#8217;re talking about the top couple hundred employees &#8211; a fraction of 1%.</p>
<p>A critical mistake is that when this succession population grows, you&#8217;re really starting in on career development, performance management, and general talent management.    Succession can easily grow out of control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
