I was directed to this very good article from WPS magazine called Succession Planning: The Nuts and Bolts of the Process which is sort of a primer on succession planning. A couple of its most enlightening observations are that 1. people often make the mistake of biting off more than they can chew with Succession – meaning that they try to collect too much data on too many people and 2. the best place to start a succession planning process is during the performance management process.
The author also points out an important decision: the one on which group will own the succession process. To me, the obvious place is HR, because succession fits so snugly with other responsibilities, but alternatives are a corporate strategy group or even a wholly separate succession group. A quote:
This entry was posted on Friday, May 12th, 2006 at 5:13 pm and is filed under Strategic HR, Talent & Performance Management. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.Once an organization has established all of the skills and competencies for every key leadership role and formulated a plan that works to take them from the current state of succession planning to the desired future state, the company must decide which department should own the process. “There’s not one cookie cutter answer in the sense that some organizations may have a corporate strategy group,” Kondo explained.













May 14th, 2006 at 9:10 pm
Max: Thanks for the link – I found it quite interesting.
It’s true that I have also never figured out why people try doing succession on very broad populations. Even for very large companies, we’re talking about the top couple hundred employees – a fraction of 1%.
A critical mistake is that when this succession population grows, you’re really starting in on career development, performance management, and general talent management. Succession can easily grow out of control.
May 15th, 2006 at 11:43 pm
Dubs,
Not sure if I agree with you on that one. Even though yours is the conventional wisdom, I have to think that things are changing. The fact that good succession planning increases retention and reduces recruiting costs (becuase internal candidates can be more readily found) makes the case, for me at least, that it’s time for succession to work it way down through the biggest organizations and even into medium sized businesses as well.