<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IDC Report Leaves Out SuccessFactors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/idc-report-leaves-out-successfactors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/idc-report-leaves-out-successfactors/</link>
	<description>Execution is the Difference.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:42:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Corsello</title>
		<link>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/idc-report-leaves-out-successfactors/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Corsello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 01:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://10.50.0.97/wordpress/workforce-performance/index.php/idc-report-leaves-out-successfactors/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Actually, I would probably agree with most of their methodology (even being an IDC competitor).  As I look at the list though, quantify (revenue) doesn&#039;t always mean quality as studies like these are really an apples and oranges comparison.  I mean, come on, comparing Salesforce.com with Workstream is a joke!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I would probably agree with most of their methodology (even being an IDC competitor).  As I look at the list though, quantify (revenue) doesn&#8217;t always mean quality as studies like these are really an apples and oranges comparison.  I mean, come on, comparing Salesforce.com with Workstream is a joke!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
