<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Business Execution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/business-execution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/business-execution/</link>
	<description>Execution is the Difference.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 07:42:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Prosen</title>
		<link>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/business-execution/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Prosen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/?p=326#comment-536</guid>
		<description>When you boil it down execution is the ability to turn thoughts into plans; plans into strategies; strategies into action; action into performance and profit. Companies have competitors and for the most part they all have similar resources from which customers choose to purchase products and services. Given there is ample demand for what companies sell the winner is the one that can out execute all others.
Bob Prosen
Former business executive
Author of Kiss Theory Good Bye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you boil it down execution is the ability to turn thoughts into plans; plans into strategies; strategies into action; action into performance and profit. Companies have competitors and for the most part they all have similar resources from which customers choose to purchase products and services. Given there is ample demand for what companies sell the winner is the one that can out execute all others.<br />
Bob Prosen<br />
Former business executive<br />
Author of Kiss Theory Good Bye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kmessick</title>
		<link>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/business-execution/comment-page-1/#comment-520</link>
		<dc:creator>kmessick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/?p=326#comment-520</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your Reply, and we&#039;re happy to have the new Blog up and running.

We couldn&#039;t agree more that HR can (and should) be a business leadership function and that people should inform strategy.   In fact our position is that the gap between strategy and execution can be filled through better business alignment and people performance.   We think it&#039;s critical for the &quot;Business&quot; and HR to partner in order to address both.

The fact of the matter is that in many companies Strategy is informed mainly by Financial and Customer metrics - i.e., companies typically don&#039;t devise strategies that they can&#039;t afford, and/or that they don&#039;t have customers for.   The breakdown comes in two areas:

People Performance
Do I have the right (human) resources needed to effectively execute?  Am I working to constantly increase high-performance and decrease low-performance?

Business Alignment
Do those resources understand the strategy? Do they understand the individual tactics needed to execute?  Can I measure progress and course correct?

Given the two issues above, it is only natural (and prudent) for HR to inform strategy, but at the end of the day the business value lies in execution of the plan more than the plan itself.  

The easiest way for HR to become a business leadership function is to provide value by serving as a conduit for execution effectiveness. 

Keith Messick
SuccessFactors Research</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your Reply, and we&#8217;re happy to have the new Blog up and running.</p>
<p>We couldn&#8217;t agree more that HR can (and should) be a business leadership function and that people should inform strategy.   In fact our position is that the gap between strategy and execution can be filled through better business alignment and people performance.   We think it&#8217;s critical for the &#8220;Business&#8221; and HR to partner in order to address both.</p>
<p>The fact of the matter is that in many companies Strategy is informed mainly by Financial and Customer metrics &#8211; i.e., companies typically don&#8217;t devise strategies that they can&#8217;t afford, and/or that they don&#8217;t have customers for.   The breakdown comes in two areas:</p>
<p>People Performance<br />
Do I have the right (human) resources needed to effectively execute?  Am I working to constantly increase high-performance and decrease low-performance?</p>
<p>Business Alignment<br />
Do those resources understand the strategy? Do they understand the individual tactics needed to execute?  Can I measure progress and course correct?</p>
<p>Given the two issues above, it is only natural (and prudent) for HR to inform strategy, but at the end of the day the business value lies in execution of the plan more than the plan itself.  </p>
<p>The easiest way for HR to become a business leadership function is to provide value by serving as a conduit for execution effectiveness. </p>
<p>Keith Messick<br />
SuccessFactors Research</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Success &#62; Execution &#124; HRWorld Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/business-execution/comment-page-1/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>Success &#62; Execution &#124; HRWorld Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 22:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.successfactors.com/blogs/business-execution/?p=326#comment-451</guid>
		<description>[...] I would warn HR practitioners against totally accepting SF’s argument that “Execution is what explains the financial performance of your company.&#160; Execution [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I would warn HR practitioners against totally accepting SF’s argument that “Execution is what explains the financial performance of your company.&#160; Execution [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
